Skip to main content

Simplest Death & Dismemberment

I love Death & Dismemberment Tables, but I get tired of looking them up. So how about an easily remembered rule?

When you reach 0 or negative hp:
Subtract 1d10 from a random attribute (1d6).

The player can choose:
1. Pass out from blood loss until you receive enough aid to get back up to positive hit points,
2. Stay on your feet like a bad-ass, but take a Permanent Injury.

If any attribute reaches 0, you are dead.
If you are injured again, you have to roll for Death & Dismemberment again.
Keep track of negative hit points—you have to recover them before you can heal your positive hp.
Attribute points take a week of full rest per point. Multiple attributes can recover at the same time.

Permanent Injuries
Write down a serious injury, such as a lost limb, next to the affected attribute. This is now a Disadvantage, whenever you use that attribute in a way that would be hindered by the injury.

The Player gets to decide what the Permanent Injury is, although it has to make sense with the attribute affected. Lost limbs work nicely for STR and DEX; torso and viscera problems work for CON; head injuries and memory loss for INT; eyes and ears for WIS; and anything that will make people wince when looking at or listening to you for CHR.

This assumes you are using roll-under attribute checks. And it steals the idea of pairing attributes with descriptors from Whitehack.

You could potentially stay on your feet for a long time after hitting 0 hp, but you’d be choosing long term disadvantage for immediate benefit, which is something you would only do in desperate circumstances—all rising up with gritted teeth, “Ignore the ribs puncturing my lungs... Arm missing... Left eye gone... Mustn’t… give… up!” Which seems like a good choice to present to a player.

Is 1d10 for attribute loss too harsh? Not harsh enough? Calibrate to the level of lethality you prefer. If you use a d6, then pretty much the only way a PC could die would be to choose to keep getting up. If you use a d20, folks will die as often as not.


Popular posts from this blog

Knaves, fancypants

I've prepared a new layout document of Ben Milton's Knaves . Knaves is a great, light rules set that has an extremely elegant core mechanic while retaining total compatibility with OSR material. It's pretty much the rpg of my dreams. This document contains the complete rules, plus a bunch of useful hacks from the community, plus a few of my invention, plus some useful resources from Ben Milton's previous effort, Maze Rats . EDIT: I've updated the layout to fix errata and make a few tweaks. Further, I've made 3 variations: KNAVES TABLET LAYOUT The Tablet Layout is meant for scrolling on screens, and contains hyperlinks. KNAVES SPREAD LAYOUT The Spread Layout is set up to print on Letter-sized paper. KNAVES A4 LAYOUT The A4 Layout is set up to print on A4 paper, and is probably the most elegant of the three versions. This is presented with generous permission from Ben Milton, and should in no way be an excuse for not purchasing a copy of Knav

Reviewing Rules for Play-by-Post Optimization

I’ve played a lot of PbP games: all your favorite flavors of OD&D, AD&D, and their retroclones, Call of Cthulhu, Marvel Superheroes, Traveller, Dungeon World, etc. ad nauseam. In almost every instance, I forgot what ruleset we were using at some point. Which is a good thing. Once chargen is over, you spend a lot more time describing your characters actions and poring over the GM’s descriptions than you spend interacting with rules. When you do roll, it’s usually a combat to-hit roll, which you’ve probably programmed into the online dice-roller as a macro. Pretty much any game will work for PbP. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t points of possible optimization. Point 1: Resolution. Anything that can keep the action moving is a boon to PbP. A game that requires a back-and-forth exchange of information to resolve an action is going to progress very slowly. A good rule of thumb is that it’ll take 2 or 3 days to get a response from any given player. At that pace, an exch

Maze Rats by Post

In my previous post , I reviewed a bunch of my favorite rulesets for optimization for Play-by-Post. It occurred to me almost immediately that I hadn't really thought about Maze Rats enough. In fact, I'd mis-remembered and mischaracterized it. Upon reflection, one of the mechanics I took issue with is actually a big strength. Re-reading the rules, it seems like just a few very simple hacks could make it a highly-optimized PbP game. As follows: Danger Rolls are rolled by the GM. Danger rolls usually fail, so it is in the player’s interest to describe their actions plausibly and mitigate as many risks as they can, in the hopes that they don’t trigger a danger roll. 2d6 + ability bonus ≥ 10 If you have taken enough precautions to have a distinct advantage in an action, but not enough to have eliminated the distinct possibility of danger, the GM will give you a roll with advantage. 3d6 keep 2 + ability bonus ≥ 10 Because each character only has 3 ability scores (S