Skip to main content

Knave 2e Alternate Attributes

Sometimes, I'm exactly in the mood for the classic simplicity of defining characters entirely by D&D's six attributes, as Knave does. But sometimes, I want the players have have just a little smidge more to fiddle with.
Repeated rounds of Covid have kept the group from meeting for awhile. So, my idle thoughts have strayed into GM solipsism: home brewing finnicky little preference into a perfectly fine system just because you can.

This approach pairs a few ability scores with a short list of broad skills. It is mostly drawn from Microlite20. I think it adds some more nuance to character mechanics without straying from Knave's philosophy of playing the world, not the character sheet.

Attributes & Skills 

3 Attributes
STRength 
DEXterity 
WIL

5 Skills
Awareness
Communication
Coordination
Knowledge
Subterfuge 

Expertise: If you roll a natural 20 on a non-combat, skill-based check, you can gain an expertise bonus of +1 in that specific activity (e.g. blacksmithing, pickpocketing, history, etc.). A character can have a number of expertises equal to half their level (minimum of 1). A player can choose to not take a new expertise if they would rather keep an existing one. Expertise never stacks.

The Rule of Specificty: I don't know if this would ever come up, but it seems like a good idea for when you let folks define skills on the fly: If two expertises are ever competing, the more specifically stated one gets the bonus. F'rinstance, if two rivals were competing to brew a new vaccine and one had an expertise in "Science" and the other in "Immunology," the Immunologist gets the bonus.

Base Mechanic

d20 + 1 Attribute + 1 Skill (+ 1 Expertise, if applicable) ≥ Target Number = Success

Combat Checks 

Melee attack bonus = STR 
Missile attack bonus = DEX
Magic attack bonus = WIL 

Item Slots

STR + 10

Character Creation 

+1 to one Attribute 
+2 to divide among skills (you can stack)
1 Expertise 

Advancement 

+1 to one Attribute 
+2 to divide among skills

Mixing and Matching Attributes & Skills

Several combinations of attributes and skills may apply to the same challenge. In climbing a cliff face, one player might rely on STR + Coordination, but another, who has studied how others have climbed similar surfaces, might use DEX + Knowledge. The referee may adjust target numbers to reflect the aptness of a particular combination.

Some Typical Recipes for 5e Skill Equivalents
Athletics = STR + Coordination
Acrobatics = DEX + Coordination
Sleight of Hand = DEX + Subterfuge
Stealth = DEX + Subterfuge
Arcana = WIL + Knowledge
History = WIL + Knowledge
Investigation = DEX + Awareness
Nature = WIL + Knowledge
Religion = WIL + Knowledge
Animal Handling = WIL + Communication
Insight = WIL + Awareness
Medicine = WIL + Knowledge
Perception = WIL + Awareness (but, of course, there are no Perception checks in Knave!)
Survival = STR + Knowledge
Deception = WIL + Subterfuge
Intimidation = STR + Communication
Performance = WIL + Communication
Persuasion = WIL + Communication

Remembering Microlite20

Back in the day, Microlite20 was the darling of the homebrew scene. Created by Robin V. Stacey from the d20 OGL, it boiled down D&D into a very simple game that made a great springboard for lots of folks to build from. Hundreds of variants sprung forth, including one or two on this blog. 

It was also a little undercooked in ways that made it very hard to actually play at the table. But I've long admired it's simple pairing of 3 attributes + 4 skills to model a wide range of character behaviors. This is from Microlite20 Pureset Essence, the first variant of Microlite I saw, and the one linked above.

An addition lots of folks made to the skill list for Microlite20 was "Survival." This is campaign-dependent, but I might add it in.

Comments

  1. Must be something in the air. I was just dusting off my Microlite house rules to start a science fantasy campaign. For some reason, whenever sci-fi is involved to any degree (even ridiculously cartoonish sci-fi), I start to think the game I'm running needs skills. (Also, I use your ASE house rules document as the jumping off point!) I guess I haven't played it enough to bump up against the quirks that make it hard to run, but I've read a lot of comments that it's underdeveloped. I like the addition of the expertise trait!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knaves, fancypants

I've prepared a new layout document of Ben Milton's Knaves . Knaves is a great, light rules set that has an extremely elegant core mechanic while retaining total compatibility with OSR material. It's pretty much the rpg of my dreams. This document contains the complete rules, plus a bunch of useful hacks from the community, plus a few of my invention, plus some useful resources from Ben Milton's previous effort, Maze Rats . EDIT: I've updated the layout to fix errata and make a few tweaks. Further, I've made 3 variations: KNAVES TABLET LAYOUT The Tablet Layout is meant for scrolling on screens, and contains hyperlinks. KNAVES SPREAD LAYOUT The Spread Layout is set up to print on Letter-sized paper. KNAVES A4 LAYOUT The A4 Layout is set up to print on A4 paper, and is probably the most elegant of the three versions. This is presented with generous permission from Ben Milton, and should in no way be an excuse for not purchasing a copy of Knav...

Reviewing Rules for Play-by-Post Optimization

I’ve played a lot of PbP games: all your favorite flavors of OD&D, AD&D, and their retroclones, Call of Cthulhu, Marvel Superheroes, Traveller, Dungeon World, etc. ad nauseam. In almost every instance, I forgot what ruleset we were using at some point. Which is a good thing. Once chargen is over, you spend a lot more time describing your characters actions and poring over the GM’s descriptions than you spend interacting with rules. When you do roll, it’s usually a combat to-hit roll, which you’ve probably programmed into the online dice-roller as a macro. Pretty much any game will work for PbP. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t points of possible optimization. Point 1: Resolution. Anything that can keep the action moving is a boon to PbP. A game that requires a back-and-forth exchange of information to resolve an action is going to progress very slowly. A good rule of thumb is that it’ll take 2 or 3 days to get a response from any given player. At that pace, an exch...

Maze Rats by Post

In my previous post , I reviewed a bunch of my favorite rulesets for optimization for Play-by-Post. It occurred to me almost immediately that I hadn't really thought about Maze Rats enough. In fact, I'd mis-remembered and mischaracterized it. Upon reflection, one of the mechanics I took issue with is actually a big strength. Re-reading the rules, it seems like just a few very simple hacks could make it a highly-optimized PbP game. As follows: Danger Rolls are rolled by the GM. Danger rolls usually fail, so it is in the player’s interest to describe their actions plausibly and mitigate as many risks as they can, in the hopes that they don’t trigger a danger roll. 2d6 + ability bonus ≥ 10 If you have taken enough precautions to have a distinct advantage in an action, but not enough to have eliminated the distinct possibility of danger, the GM will give you a roll with advantage. 3d6 keep 2 + ability bonus ≥ 10 Because each character only has 3 ability scores (S...